the ch!cktionary

    24 Jan 2011

    chasetheskyforever-deactivated2 asked: Hi Lena-- I appreciated your viewpoints on the usage of the word "queer." It's my opinion that for true multicultural understanding to be fostered, society needs to look at the diversity of differences within it and accept them as they are, rather than glossing them all over. Indeed, there's nothing wrong with being different and it seems silly to act as though differences don't exist in the name of being politically correct. It seems more appropriate for persons to claim their differences as part of their identity (for example, I know people who have been told by others that they didn't see their ethnicity or their sexuality, but just saw a person, and felt as though they were being talked down to or that crucial parts of their self-concept were being ignored) and be proud of them.

    Glad that you liked my mini-history lesson on the word “queer”. I know that Women’s Studies (or what’s called “Women, Gender, & Sexuality Studies” at Harvard) gets a bad rap for being too academic and theory-heavy, but it appears as if I’ve managed to find a practical application for the knowledge I picked up in college!

    Now how many people can say that?

    Burning questions, comments, or kudos? Submit ‘em to Lena here.

    18 Jan 2011

    Anonymous asked: Hi Lena,

    I've been reading you for a while and there is one thing I have wanted to comment on. As a member of the queer community and a feminist, I am confused and hurt by your use of the word "coming out" for "feminist coming out day". I know that for many individuals, both female, male and trans, self-identifying as a feminist is difficult and sometimes challenging due to perceived stereotypes and opinions of feminists. However, "coming out" as a queer person is still a very very very different experience, one that is much more rife with personal identity issues, fear of harm or violence and can result in political, financial, or social consequences. When a feminist self-identifies, I do not think they recently had to worry about being fired from the military, or being unable to marry their partner in several states, or must worry that their families, churches or schools will disown then immediately for their 'choices'. As someone who identifies as both, I can say that "coming out" is a word that is very central to the queer community and should not be appropriated for something, that while challenging to do as well, has far less potential danger or symbolic meaning. I applaud your efforts to have more feminists acknowledge their beliefs openly, but would really ask that you try to consider your use of language and how it might come across to members of the queer community who would like to be involved but would not like their struggle to be marginalized or appropriated.

    This isn’t the first time that someone’s expressed these sentiments, so I’d like to take the opportunity to thoroughly address them and open up a dialogue about the naming of the event. As someone who was involved in queer and trans activism long before working in women’s rights, the last thing I’d want to do is to appropriate the struggles of a marginalized group of which I consider myself an ally. I completely agree that “coming out” as a queer person is much more difficult than declaring one’s commitment to gender equality, which is partly why we planned Feminist Coming Out Day for March 8th, an existing holiday (International Women’s Day), rather than devoting an entirely new date to the campaign.

    The About section of the event website hints at the origins of Feminist Coming Out Day, but here’s a more detailed explanation of its history:

    The first Feminist Coming Out Day (which took place on March 8th, 2010) was a student-led event at Harvard co-sponsored by the Radcliffe Union of Students (RUS is the campus feminist group) and the Queer Students & Allies, of which I was the Women’s Events & Outreach Chair. I was nominated to that position in December 2009, right before my last semester of college. I’d been on the organization’s board before, back in my freshman year, when the group was still known as the Bisexual, Gay, Lesbian, Transgendered, & Supporters Alliance (I know — an alphabet soup!). But I was slightly hesitant to run this time for a couple reasons. First, I’d devoted my later college years to several women’s groups (not what I would call feminism, as these were mostly professional organizations uninvolved in political advocacy) and it wasn’t until I returned after my gap year that I started attending queer events again. Though I was writing more about gender and sexuality than I’d ever had before, I felt old and out of touch with the LGBT community at Harvard. Second, I wasn’t sure if I was running against an incumbent or someone who was queer. The reason this mattered is because I firmly believe that a person who identifies as part of a marginalized group is almost always better suited to serve that group than someone who is an ally (no matter how well-intentioned). Since the chairship was a newly created position with no queer nominees, I decided to run for it. The stated responsibility of the Women’s Events & Outreach Chair is to “enhance women’s involvement and representation in Harvard College’s queer community” while creating alliances with women’s groups on campus, so I submitted a candidacy statement which included the following excerpt:

    Though both queer and women’s advocacy share strikingly similar ideologies, there’s still a tendency to view them as distinctly different causes. My experiences have taught me that it’s impossible to divorce the queer movement (or any like-minded movement) from progressive advocacy at large. (The Women’s Center, which opened my sophomore year, is a testament to the power of group action.) One of my goals for the QSA is to increase collaboration with other campus groups that share our aims. Given some of the abstinence-movement-related conversations I observed this semester over the QSA & RUS [Harvard’s feminist group] email lists, it’s clear that there’s a great deal of overlapping concerns in Harvard’s queer and feminist communities (and this is only one of many examples). I know firsthand that the QSA has always been welcoming to allies, but only through mobilizing this support can we more substantially influence campus dialogue and politics.

    When QSA wanted to participate in Harvard Women’s Week, a week-long series of women’s programming, I came up with the concept for Feminist Coming Out Day, because sexual orientation and gender identity/expression are the perfect examples of how gendered expectations hurt everyone. (This was the same reasoning behind Rethinking Virginity, a conference I organized for the QSA in May.) While RUS, the campus feminist club, co-sponsored FCOD with us and helped execute much of the logistics, the idea originated from brainstorms I had with QSA board members. I can’t recall if anyone at Harvard mentioned concerns about “Feminist Coming Out Day” being an inappropriate use of the term “coming out”, but that’s likely because the QSA was planning it and in any case, there is significant overlap between the queer and feminist communities at the school (both because of shared social groups and academic interests). And since the QSA was already known for campus awareness campaigns centered around National Coming Out Day, which takes place in the fall, a similarly inspired/named spring semester event was not particularly controversial. In retrospect, it was presumptuous of me to think that what might work at  a particular college would work similarly on a national scale. The reality is that the women’s movement as a whole has historically not been very inclusive of queer voices. It’s not surprising then that those not familiar with the event’s origins see it as an appropriation of the queer struggle for equality.

    I have a sentimental attachment to the name “Feminist Coming Out Day”, but I’m not opposed to changing it (if not this year, then next) and would encourage anyone with similar concerns to the above poster to get in touch with me — in the comments or through email. At the same time, because the first rendition of “Feminist Coming Out Day” was very much about bridge-building and intersectionality, renaming the event and eliminating any references to the queer movement would feel like we were erasing the involvement of the queer activists and allies who inspired the original concept and made the first event a success. Since the Harvard QSA and RUS are collaborating again this year to plan a campus version of Feminist Coming Out Day (in conjunction with the national campaign), I think a renaming should only occur at this point if it’s agreed to by the current boards of both those organizations. I’d very much like to hear and pass on (to RUS and QSA) any ideas that would allow for a compromise that still acknowledges the event’s queer origins, especially since our outreach is targeted equally at women’s and LGBT rights organizations.

    More burning questions or comments? Submit them here.

    Want to learn more about Feminist Coming Out Day? Check out the official website.

    6 Jan 2011

    Misdirected Emails

    Actual email just received:

    Dear Lena:

    Gay-egalitarianism is a four-decades-long fraud.  It has no basis—factual, logical, ethical, or constitutional. If you are willing to expose yourself (no pun intended) to some new information, you can check out: www.narth.com

    Especially.

    Jeffrey Satinover’s “The ‘Trojan Couch’:  How Mental Health Associations Misrepresent Science”
    Charles Socarides’s “Sexual Politics and Scientific Logic”

    www.gaytostraight.org
     
    www.peoplecanchange.com

    www.pfox.org


    The American people don’t have to accept this fraud.  They can refuse—commit civil disobedience—and pay a short-term price but win long-term.
     Thank you.

    —Sharon Kass
    Washington, D.C.

    You’re targeting the wrong person, lady. I don’t know what “gay egalitarianism” is, but the “ex-gay” movement is definite bunk. There is no amount of therapy that is going to make any of my gay male friends desire vagina.

    27 Dec 2010

    Anonymous asked: I hate to sound like a superficial jerk, but you've won so many cred points in my book for having a gay bestie. I'm a gay male myself, and well, whenever one of my female besties dates a new guy, I judge the guy sharply on how decently he treats someone like me. It's almost like the waitress gauge, if you catch my drift. It speaks in volumes when a straight male can approach me like a basic human being. As a woman, you probably understand what it's like to be met with an instant profile. It sucks. It's awful. And you know, it's sad that society has bred this kind of complex in us -- like we're different yet keen to serious instances of profiling when it comes to quotidian situations. I want to live my life as diversely as possible without fear of unfair judgment. Wouldn't that world be nice? I wish I could explain myself better, but I'm not as articulate as you are. As a frequent reader of your work, thanks for taking on this crusade. Oh, and thanks for befriending someone like me. The next time you see your gay bestie, please give him a hug letting him know that you appreciate who he is =)

    P.S. Just saw your feminist bar at the top of your blog for Feminist Coming Out Day. You can bet I'll submit my story soon, and not as a feminist ally but as a feminist in my own right!

    Aww … this made me smile! And I’m sure it will make Jason smile too, once he gets back to civilization and can access the Internet again. (He’s currently skiing in Maine, and I miss him a ton, naturally.)

    You know, whenever a stranger (typically a straight person) tells me how cool it is that my best friend is gay, it usually comes off as very tokenizing. As I’ve written before, I have a huge pet peeve about that stereotype. I’m no more Carrie than Jason is Stanford (Sex and the City’s token gay, FYI), yet Jason is so often treated like an accessory of mine. Girls exclaim to me all the time that they want a gay best friend of their very own, like oh my god, where did I get him? Honey, my best friend’s sexual orientation is not last season’s studded headband.

    So I found this comment a refreshing change, and I totally get what you mean about gauging a straight guy’s dateability based on his treatment of queer people. Jason is a huge part of my life. We both majored in sociology (he chose the major because I told him he’d like it), took half our classes together, lived in the same dorm (even though we weren’t officially assigned there), and talk/email/IM everyday (sometimes, multiple times a day). Save for a two-year gap when he was incessantly unavailable (NO, I AM NOT STILL BITTER ABOUT THAT), we’ve pretty much been unhealthily emotionally dependent on each other since the first day of Freshman Orientation at Harvard, way back in the fall of 2005. Since we became so immediately enamored with each other, a lot of our classmates (and even Jason’s father) initially thought we weren’t really “just friends”, if ya know what I mean. In short, it would be incredibly awkward, complicated, and heartbreaking if I were ever placed in a position where I’d have to choose between him and someone else. Also, that someone else would definitely not emerge the victor. My friendship with Jason is perhaps my closest and most significant relationship with any man and will always take precedence.

    Perhaps because he’s generally not at all jealous or threatened by my relationships with other guys, I take it for granted that Patrick is super tolerant, has tons of queer friends of his own, and enjoys Jason’s company independent of my presence. While I know that I shouldn’t have to give my boyfriend a gold star for being a non-homophobic straight dude (because shouldn’t tolerance be a basic expectation?), I have definitely been in dating situations in the past where I thought, “Okay, this is never going to get serious, because he won’t get along with my gay friends.” And though some people are patient enough to work through these differences with their partner, I’m just not the type of person who can hand-hold someone through the process of overcoming deep-seated biases, so I’m glad that Jason’s sexual orientation was a non-issue from the beginning.

    More burning questions? Ask Lena Chen.

    (Want to submit your Feminist Coming Out Story? Visit the Feminist Coming Out Day website!)

    12 Nov 2010

    3 Nov 2010

    “I am not worried that your son will grow up to be an actual ninja so back off.”
    — an amazing mother on the indignant and homophobic responses she confronted when her 5-year-old dressed up as Daphne from Scooby Doo for Halloween

    (Source: nerdyapplebottom.com)

    20 Oct 2010

    Does Wearing Purple Make A Difference?

    So, Spirit Day. I’ll be honest: originally, I was thinking, “Are you serious? People are wearing purple color-fy their avatars and this is somehow going to stop gay teens from killing themselves?”

    Because wearing pink definitely has no causal relationship to curing cancer.

    But I have to admit that there’s something inspiring about tracking the Twitter hashtag (#spiritday) and watching new tweets roll in every second from all corners of the world. It makes me hope that some kid who feels alone is tuning in at the same time. No, this won’t change public policy, and yes, a part of me thinks that most people won’t give this much more thought a week from now, but I couldn’t have imagined such a concerted effort like this happening when I was in high school, and that’s progress in itself.

    I do think visibility and awareness are important for ally- and community-building, since it offers a lot of time-crunched people to show their support in a small way. (After all, I’m planning a very similar event centered around feminism, aren’t I?) Still, when I personally know so many people who make their activism their day-to-day work, it’s easy to be holier than thou about this stuff. I have to remind myself that being a professional radical is a privilege in itself and that not everyone has the luxury of choosing the same kind of life.

    And hey, there have definitely been mornings when I woke up, pinned a rainbow ribbon to my tote bag, and called it a day. So really, I should stop being such a grinch.

    11 Oct 2010

    Anonymous asked: You're a big supporter of the LGBT Rights Movement and so am I. I was wondering how you feel about being friends with people who are anti-gay? I recently found out that a person whom I considered to be a very good friend is very, very anti-gay. He would never go around bullying or physically hurting anyone because they're gay, but he is definitely a detriment to the movement, cannot be in the same room with them and would definitely, for example, vote agaisnt any laws that would advance the movement. I'm not entirely sure how I feel about this, since before I found out I truly liked him as a person, and am curious to know what you think.

    First of all, I think “anti-gay” can mean a lot of things. It can mean someone who believes in ignorant stereotypes about gay people but is sort of ambivalent and not terribly invested either way (e.g. someone’s super traditional grandparents, for example) or it can mean someone who thinks gay people are literally going to bring about societal ruin and therefore deserve political oppression (e.g. Tea Party members). Obviously, there are also Tea Party grannies in the mix.

    I totally empathize with you, because though I’m WAY too much of a fruit fly for anyone to out themselves as a homophobe to me, I’ve had people say racist or classist things that have made me extremely uncomfortable. And I’ll confess — sometimes, I say things in response, but most of the time, I don’t, and instead make a silent mental note. I could tell you to have that uncomfortable conversation in which you try to reason with your friend and make him see the light, but this tactic seems unlikely to change his mind given the way you describe him — as “very, very anti-gay” to the point where he “cannot be in the same room with them”. But while I don’t think that you or anyone else has a moral imperative to intervene and make a statement (some people are comfortable with that, others will never be okay about confrontation), I do think that you need to be true to your own feelings, meaning that you shouldn’t pretend to be his friend, if you really don’t want to be. (And obviously, you should also be honest about the reasons why you’ve detached if this is the route you choose to take.)

    I know that personally, it would be impossible for me to maintain a meaningful relationship with a person who is that staunchly anti-gay. Besides the fact that I do a lot of social justice work and have a low tolerance for bullshit, I also like mixing social circles and I have too many close gay friends; the potential for awkwardness would be painfully high. You have to assess for yourself how much your friend’s prejudices impact your relationship (with each other and with others) and if the resulting consequences are worth it.

    (Also, can I just say that this is PRECISELY the type of question I love answering? Don’t get me wrong — I totally like fielding queries about freelance writing, Hamlet, and secondhand shopping, but I jump on anything in the realm of “the personal is the political”.)

    More burning questions? Ask Lena Chen.

    5 Oct 2010

    “People like you and me- young Americans- are largely disgusted by gay bashing and demonizing abortions for rape victims and claiming that all immigrants are drug mules and Obama’s a fascist, socialist, muslim foreigner. Even those of us who are fiscally conservative find such garbage so offensive that it will ultimately undermine the GOP. For our generation, these fags and foreigners we’re supposed to fear are our FRIENDS. We grew up with them. We went to school with them. We vacation with them. We get drunk with them. And we fall in love with them. Fear mongering depends on delineating the Other and convincing everyone else that the Other is dangerous. You are in a zero-sum game with these deviants. The stakes are always infinite and conveniently abstract. The problem is, WE DON’T BELIEVE YOU. When you went from blowing spit balls at your Civics teacher together all the way to congratulating each other on your marriages, children, and new jobs, “they’re out to get you” is going to be a hard sell. So fuck off.”
    Kennedy (God, I love my bestie)