the ch!cktionary

    9 Feb 2012

    “He Came To Stay” | Explosion Proof Fall 2011

    Forgot to blog this when it came out last fall, but here’s a personal essay I wrote about my relationship with Patrick (for Explosion Proof’s “State of the Union” issue). Simone de Beauvoir inspired the title. I was reading Tête-à-Tête at the time.

    (To read the article, click to the individual page and right-click “view image”).

    22 Dec 2011

    Check out Amanda Hess’ round-up of “Dealbreakers” columns that ran this year on GOOD Magazine (including the one I wrote: He’s Got An Asian Fetish).

    I’ve been reading the series semi-religiously (sort of like what I used to do with the New York Times’ Modern Love before it became increasingly contrived). I’ve loved some of the pieces, grimaced at others, and been thoroughly impressed by the emotional honesty of many of the contributors. I wanted to share some of my favorites below:

    “He’s Dated Men” by Helena Andrews

    I wrote about this when it first came out, and I still think this is one of the most powerful personal essays I’ve read anywhere, because it’s incredibly difficult — especially as a self-identified “progressive” — to admit that you hold prejudices. Helena’s story is significant particularly because her mom is gay and she still can’t overcome her bias against bisexual men. It’s a tale I’d expect from a conservative, not from someone who resembles myself.

    “He Has A ‘Girlfriend’” by Zack Rosen

    Zack’s essay inspired this post on the “fag hag” phenomenon and associated gay stereotypes. The reasons I like it are probably clear from that post. Gay male/straight female friendships are so frequently celebrated in pop culture (in an entirely superficial manner, of course), but there are plenty of not-so-healthy versions of these relationships. Just like you’d expect with hetero pals, there can be some seriously dysfunctional habits, and it’s amplified by the fact that one party’s sexual orientation is often fetishized.

    “She Needed Me” by Mike Riggs / “He’s On the Rebound” by Jessica Guilfoyle

    Both of these columns shared some painful and all-too-common romantic experiences without blaming the other party or making the writer seem faultless in what went wrong. The latter is what really resonated with me, because relationships aren’t about one person and what they did or didn’t do. I wish I admitted this in my own column, but things would have turned out quite differently had I simply been brave enough to confront the guy about my concerns.

    Those are my favorites (do give them a read!), and you can see the whole archive here.

    30 Nov 2011

    How The Internet Changed My Sex Life | Audrey Magazine
I was a guest columnist for Audrey Magazine’s Fall 2011 issue. Here’s a snippet of my piece on how online dating has altered the way we choose partners:

With the array of choices online, it’s tempting to rely on search features that comb through user databases to spit out results based on age, ethnicity, religion, education and even dietary preferences. The criteria with which you can assess potential partners range from the trivial (pet ownership status) to the maddeningly obscure (foreign languages spoken). Should a romantic decision really come down to whether someone is more of a dog person or a cat person? The Internet can make dating seem like an interview process. It’s easy to get caught up in looking for the next best thing or to falsely believe that you don’t need to compromise on your vision of an ideal partner or relation- ship, because there’s always that elusive better offer.

In this day and age, what happens virtually isn’t distinct from “the real world”; it’s part of it. I think OkCupid, Grindr, and similar services can be really fantastic ways to meet people (as long as you don’t get addicted, as SO many of my friends have). I know plenty of folks who have turned online flirtations into offline relationships, but just as many who end up in unfulfilling cycles of serial dating.
The article’s not up on the magazine’s website yet, but my editor just sent the PDF to me. To read the whole thing, click here.

    How The Internet Changed My Sex Life | Audrey Magazine

    I was a guest columnist for Audrey Magazine’s Fall 2011 issue. Here’s a snippet of my piece on how online dating has altered the way we choose partners:

    With the array of choices online, it’s tempting to rely on search features that comb through user databases to spit out results based on age, ethnicity, religion, education and even dietary preferences. The criteria with which you can assess potential partners range from the trivial (pet ownership status) to the maddeningly obscure (foreign languages spoken). Should a romantic decision really come down to whether someone is more of a dog person or a cat person? The Internet can make dating seem like an interview process. It’s easy to get caught up in looking for the next best thing or to falsely believe that you don’t need to compromise on your vision of an ideal partner or relation- ship, because there’s always that elusive better offer.

    In this day and age, what happens virtually isn’t distinct from “the real world”; it’s part of it. I think OkCupid, Grindr, and similar services can be really fantastic ways to meet people (as long as you don’t get addicted, as SO many of my friends have). I know plenty of folks who have turned online flirtations into offline relationships, but just as many who end up in unfulfilling cycles of serial dating.

    The article’s not up on the magazine’s website yet, but my editor just sent the PDF to me. To read the whole thing, click here.

    3 Oct 2011

    What do you call it when you really like someone, spend the night together all the time, but don’t necessarily want to shack up? According to a team of University of Missouri researchers, that’s a “stayover relationship,” and it’s becoming a popular dating model for young adults …

    So! This was the topic of my latest piece for SexReally.com, and I’m dying to know: has anyone heard of the term “stayover relationships” before or do you share the stance of my friend (below):

    When I asked a female friend if I could talk to her about her thoughts on her own stayover relationship, she told me, “I’ve never heard of this term … i thought that’s just what couples did.”

    Right?! That’s totally what I thought too, but I do think it makes some sense to distinguish the stayover model from cohabitation. As much as I cringe at trend stories, this is a social phenomenon that deserves more than a mention in The New York Times’ Style section. Why? Because it indicates that social mores and the experiences of young adults have changed dramatically in recent decades. From my article:

    Plenty of people—not just young folks—do use the stayover model today with no fanfare. A couple generations ago, however, it never would have existed, at least not without some serious controversy. What changed in between? For one, women nowadays enjoy greater economic equality and no longer have to choose between living with their parents and moving in with their husband. It’s socially acceptable and economically feasible for them to live on their own, while simultaneously, the taboo against premarital sex have loosened. Young people today are also getting married later, in part because of higher education.

    Call me a geek, but I’m pretty fascinated how courtship patterns evolve as a result of changes in gender equality and views toward queer sexuality. Definitely a topic worth further sociological examination.

    15 Sep 2011

    As promised, here’s my essay for GOOD. An excerpt below:

    I was born in San Francisco and raised in Los Angeles. If you heard my voice without knowing what I looked like, you’d probably assume that I was a teenage white girl. My idea of fashion is a pair of skinny jeans, not a kimono. My parents are immigrants, but I am, for all intents and purposes, American through and through. Yet I wasn’t even out of high school when men began greeting me with “konichiwa, beautiful” on the street. (I am not Japanese). As I got older, the catcalls took a turn for the lewd: “Me love you long time!” “Sucky sucky!” I’ve lost track of the number of times a guy has gotten in my face and yelled the name of a random Asian country as a primitive courting strategy: “Hey, Korea!” “Vietnam?” “You Thai?” Even seemingly respectable men in respectable settings would introduce themselves and ask, “Where are you from?” only to frown and follow up with “No, really” when I responded with “California.”

    8 Sep 2011

    Split The Tab! Negotiating Contraceptive Equality In Relationships | Sex Really

    So, to recap the latest in contraceptive news: the new birth control legislation will provide free coverage for many Americans, but there are still plenty of folks who won’t qualify. If you’re one of the unlucky people without full coverage, you might want to consider talking to your partner about splitting the bill. That’s the subject of my latest webisode for Sex Really, and it’s a pretty tricky one to tackle. When I write for teen audiences, I frequently get asked, “How do I know if I’m ready for sex?” and as a general rule of thumb, I think if you’re not ready to talk about sex and its ramifications, then you’re not ready to be having it. One can apply that to relationships too — you should be getting down with people with whom you can discuss What Ifs and sexual histories and preferred condom brands! That said, the reality is that there are such things as stranger sex and ill-defined faux-mances. We don’t always know the folks we fuck, these can be really awkward conversations to have, and depending on the nature of your relationship, financial assistance from a partner might not be something with which you’re comfortable. (Not to mention that our partners can be just as strapped for cash as we are, and it can be hard to determine how much of reproductive health costs should be shared.)

    All of that is to say that I understand if you don’t want to bring up prescriptions and co-pays on your next date. There are, however, some pretty huge ramifications to shouldering the cost of contraception alone, so if your partner is in a position to help out, I encourage you to have that conversation. Check out this informal Urtak poll I conducted of readers:

    The Roomie and I have taken turns pay for my birth control. During a six-month gap in insurance back in 2008, he provided my pills. When I got on state-subsidized healthcare, I paid a monthly premium of $40 for a year and got an IUD. Nowadays, I have no monthly premium, though I also haven’t racked up any additional reproductive healthcare costs, beyond the occasional pap smear. I’d never feel weird about bringing up birth control with Patrick, but my attitude is definitely influenced by the fact that we live together and share other things as it is. Has anyone else — particularly non-cohabitating folks — ever split the bill?

    21 Jul 2011

    Sex Really With Lena Chen | How Much Do You Spend on Birth Control?

    Check out the latest episode, featuring different women discussing their preferred method and how much it costs them each month. You might be surprised at how it adds up!

    This video is part of the We’ve Got You Covered/Birth Control Matters blog carnival hosted by the National Women’s Law Center & Planned Parenthood. Check out the full post on SexReally.com, a project of the National Campaign To Prevent Teen & Unplanned Pregnancy.

    12 Jul 2011

    Wow, I’m super late in blogging this, but I contributed a while back to HOAX, a radical queer feminist collaborative zine. I got my copy in the mail at some point during or in between traveling last month (thus my forgetfulness in mentioning it!), and it is pretty frickin’ awesome. Please support the zine! For less than five bucks, you get to enjoy lots of fab art and writing + the wonderful feeling that comes with holding in your hands a true labor of love. And it’s super aesthetic — sitting on my coffee table back in Boston right this moment.
My piece ran in hoax #5, the feminisms and community issue:

Essays include: core requirements for a “safer  space”; a manifesta written as the basis for the mother ourselves  bootcamp for queer folks of color; supporting those who are new to  feminism; notes from a trans*feminist; queer land movements; community  in the punk scene; environmental consciousness and ecofeminist policy; a  comic about food co-ops; parenting and looking to create community for  one’s child; a coming of age story about radicalization through queer  internet forums and punk rock; thoughts on collectives; wanting a more  intersectionary feminist community; rethinking personal feminist  politics; a comic about the cons of “women’s space;” reflections of a  soon-to-be community organizer; a short introduction to the amish  community; an intersectional feminist library short list; girl-on-girl  crime & the need for unity amongst women; a reinvestigation on  sexual assault; the effects of a family member’s suicide; a powerful  poem called “crowing the may queen,” reflections of zine release party  that implemented as “safer space” policy; and how the labor movement has  helped feminism! also includes an interview with the editors, original  art/comics, prose, feminist we love, and vegan recipes! 1/2 size, 68  pages, b&w, and super text heavy!
in case you have not already heard, we have decided to pledge 10% OF THE PROCEEDS OF EACH ISSUE PURCHASED FROM US THROUGH SEPTEMBER TO SUPPORT BO THE DOG’S KNEE SURGERY. you can read more about bo’s condition and sari’s fundraising efforts here.
you can order hoax #5 by emailing your name & address to hoaxzine@gmail.com. we will be mailing in order of whoever emails us first! we are asking $4 or a trade of similiar worth.  we accept well-hidden cash via snail mail and paypal to hoaxzine@gmail.com.

They now have an Etsy store up, where you can browse the selection of previous issues as well :)
[For more information on the back issues published, read the note from editors Rachel and Sari here.]

    Wow, I’m super late in blogging this, but I contributed a while back to HOAX, a radical queer feminist collaborative zine. I got my copy in the mail at some point during or in between traveling last month (thus my forgetfulness in mentioning it!), and it is pretty frickin’ awesome. Please support the zine! For less than five bucks, you get to enjoy lots of fab art and writing + the wonderful feeling that comes with holding in your hands a true labor of love. And it’s super aesthetic — sitting on my coffee table back in Boston right this moment.

    My piece ran in hoax #5, the feminisms and community issue:

    Essays include: core requirements for a “safer space”; a manifesta written as the basis for the mother ourselves bootcamp for queer folks of color; supporting those who are new to feminism; notes from a trans*feminist; queer land movements; community in the punk scene; environmental consciousness and ecofeminist policy; a comic about food co-ops; parenting and looking to create community for one’s child; a coming of age story about radicalization through queer internet forums and punk rock; thoughts on collectives; wanting a more intersectionary feminist community; rethinking personal feminist politics; a comic about the cons of “women’s space;” reflections of a soon-to-be community organizer; a short introduction to the amish community; an intersectional feminist library short list; girl-on-girl crime & the need for unity amongst women; a reinvestigation on sexual assault; the effects of a family member’s suicide; a powerful poem called “crowing the may queen,” reflections of zine release party that implemented as “safer space” policy; and how the labor movement has helped feminism! also includes an interview with the editors, original art/comics, prose, feminist we love, and vegan recipes! 1/2 size, 68 pages, b&w, and super text heavy!

    in case you have not already heard, we have decided to pledge 10% OF THE PROCEEDS OF EACH ISSUE PURCHASED FROM US THROUGH SEPTEMBER TO SUPPORT BO THE DOG’S KNEE SURGERY. you can read more about bo’s condition and sari’s fundraising efforts here.

    you can order hoax #5 by emailing your name & address to hoaxzine@gmail.com. we will be mailing in order of whoever emails us first! we are asking $4 or a trade of similiar worth.  we accept well-hidden cash via snail mail and paypal to hoaxzine@gmail.com.

    They now have an Etsy store up, where you can browse the selection of previous issues as well :)

    [For more information on the back issues published, read the note from editors Rachel and Sari here.]

    24 May 2011

    As promised, here’s the link to my personal essay for Salon on learning sexual shame from my sex blogging days in college. It only took an hour before I got my first “You will never find a husband comment”! That’s got to be a record, right?

    I also got this comment earlier today on the blog, likely in response to the article:

    Hello Lena. I am writing this anonymously since I really don’t feel like filling out forms and registering on your site. I will gladly email you my personal info if you feel like you want it after your read my post. I doubt you will and I also feel like this will not be replied to or put on your wall.  Keep reading after the next line and trust that it’s all going somewhere and isn’t simply a blasting of you or anyone.

    You are whore and disgrace to women.

    The fact that I am not a misogynist and do believe in female empowerment is why I say this.  Having had sex with more men than one could have fostered any sort of meaningful relationship with is crude, empty, and vulgar. Note* I didn’t attach a number to such things but rather a character quality.  What does it say about someone who pops their dick in any woman’s mouth? Note* I just switched genders on this.  Man or woman it does not matter. There is no double standard. Men who sleep around are also seen and prejudized against as “pigs,” “hustlers,” “players.”  Girls having sex as  young as 13 will start even younger and those blowjobs to a different guy each day during recess will cum (pun very much intended) more readily the more such behavior is glorified or made okay. I personally and many if not all of my friends would have no respect for a woman who has slept around or even “Sucked” around men who she hasn’t known on a deeper level for a year or so. No one wants to marry a whore or have children with a whore.  No one wants the mother of their child to have had such little sense of worth and self respect for themselves.  If woman want empowerment it starts with respect.  Have some for yourself though it’s too late in your case. You sound like a rape victim or molestation victim with severe unresolved psychological issues to be blunt.

    Now. Why would anyone in the world leave a comment like the above? This is something I’ve asked myself over and over and over since I started blogging in 2006. If you read the comments over at Salon, there’s enough chastising to last an unrepentant harlot a lifetime! (Note to readers: do not actually read comments to Salon article lest you become triggered/incensed/completely disheartened by the state of humanity.)

    You know what the above sounds like to me? “You are a whore and a disgrace to women and will never find a man to marry or inseminate you BECAUSE MY FRIENDS AND I THINK SO.” Sorry, dude, but opinions are like assholes! Everyone has one and yours is a bit … narrow, if you know what I mean. Theodor Adorno once said, “The idea of the free expression of opinion, which indeed cannot be separated from the idea of a free society, necessarily becomes the right to propose, defend, and if possible successfully champion one’s own opinion, even when it is false, mad, disastrous.” Poorly supported Internet arguments are a great example of how freedom and opinions can actually lead to appalling displays of ignorance.

    Here’s the deal: I don’t typically engage with comments like this but the multiple LOGIC FAILS pain me so greatly that I’ll address this one. You don’t get to say “Everyone believes X” by using you and your friends as proof. You don’t get to say “Women are only empowered if they do X” by using your personal preferences as a gauge for where one’s individual liberty begins and ends. You don’t get to assume things about my psychological history when you do not know me and are not my therapist.

    Speaking of my mental health, I will gladly admit to being ALL KINDS OF CRAZY, because, hey, I don’t think I need to be ashamed of the fact that I was incredibly unhappy in college, but in my history of therapists, none of them have ever implied that my blogging is the result of “unresolved psychological issues”. If anything, they agreed that Harvard quite literally drove me nuts and that the World Wide Web and my classmates were judgmental pricks who likely caused the depression and anxiety I suffered through undergrad. It is completely possible to determine that sexual morality is repressive and harmful without having experienced any of the trauma that random Internet people have suggested that I’ve suffered. But whatever, go ahead and make offensive generalizations about survivors of sexual assault! Isn’t that just way easier than rational thinking? (On the off-chance that the sarcasm doesn’t translate, I am being 100 percent sarcastic.)

    One thing that the above commenter asks strikes me as particularly illogical: “What does it say about someone who pops their dick in any woman’s mouth?” Answer: THEY CLEARLY LIKE BLOWJOBS! That’s it. That’s all that tells you. One’s eagerness to place one’s penis in a mouth does not say anything about whether one pays taxes on time or remembers to call home for Mother’s Day or tips well at dinner. You can draw almost no generalizable conclusions from a predilection for oral sex. Nor can you draw any conclusions about a person from their number of sexual partners or their sexual history. You don’t know them. How in the world can you think that you know their motivations for doing anything in life?

    For the record, I don’t think anyone or any gender should be shamed for their sexuality. Men shouldn’t deal with policing of their bodies and sexual behavior, but I do bring up double standards because there is a clear difference in how female sexuality has been legislated and policed by both state and community. And while dudes have been subject to some of the same norms as women, the latter — by virtue of reproductive capability — have been much more frequent targets. The majority portion of the negative feedback I receive is based on my gender. (A significant portion is also based on my race. Think: “Me love you long time” type of shit.) In this day and age, I don’t have to worry about being forced into a nunnery for women of ill repute, but I am routinely told that I will never find a husband, that I am not being “a lady”, that my self-worth is tied to my vagina’s ability to appeal to potential suitors. Men do not get anywhere close to this sort of criticism, in part because no one assumes that a guy’s primary goal in life is to get hitched but also because the white, male body has not historically been a site of repression. Men who do get harassed for their sexual choices also frequently exhibit behavior perceived to be “feminine” (e.g. being sexually submissive in bed, having sex with men, being the receptive partner/bottom, etc.) or possess qualities that society reads to be dangerous (e.g. being of a person of color, a HIV-positive person, etc.). Which is also problematic, but has different underlying causes.

    The single thing the Salon commenters did get right, though? I’m probably never getting married. Fine by me. This ho-skank has been contentedly living in sin since 2008.

    1 Apr 2011

    The Back Up Your Birth Control campaign’s National Day of Action has come and gone. Did you back it up? My friend Rachel Kramer Bussel wrote a brave and personal piece about personal accountability and fallibility when it comes to birth control. Check out all the bloggers who wrote about their experiences.

    And if you need more reason to, the emergency contraception edition of Sex Really is now on the front page of RH Reality Check. Watch it when you get the chance :)