the ch!cktionary

    19 Aug 2009

    How To Work From Home Without Going Insane

    Most of the time, I love the convenience of my work-from-home job, but occasionally (particularly in the dead of Boston winter), I think I’m going to pull a “Heeere’s Johnny!” on my roommate and our unsuspecting bulldog. I’ve been working remotely since October 2008 for an education nonprofit based in the Midwest (though I’m leaving my job this fall to return to school). It’s a full-time position and since the responsibilities are mostly editorial, that means a lot of time sitting alone in front of a glowing rectangle.

    Even the most resilient telecommuter can go nuts from constant solitude and inactivity. Here are my tried-and-true tips on how to stay productive, healthy, and sane while working remotely:

    1. Don’t actually work at home (at least not all the time).

    This especially applies if you 1) live in a small apartment, 2) lack exposure to direct sunlight, or 3) don’t have an office … or uh, furniture, in my case. It took me a while to learn that a living room of pillows does not add up to a desk, but the same goes for those who are chilling out with laptops on their kitchen counters. If your live-work space is more of a live/work space, then balance out your time at home with some time at Starbucks, the Apple Store work stations, or even the public library. I may specialize in the “edgy” field of social media by day, but preparing my dinner by night while five feet away from the spot my ass occupied for the last five hours does not feel cutting edge in the least. Changing your location, even just a couple times a week, will keep you from getting claustrophobic and hating your apartment. (Plus, the taxpayer-subsidized reading chair I can’t afford to own does wonders for your posture.)

    2. 9-to-5 isn’t for everyone.

    Depending on your employer’s flexibility, you may not have to log hours in the traditional eight-a-day kind of way. That’s a benefit of working remotely, and if your schedule doesn’t fit into the typical 9-to-5 workday, you shouldn’t force it to, though completely erratic hours aren’t advisable either (some routine is a good thing). Of course, you should keep in mind certain constraints, such as the availability of friends who have less flexible schedules and designated hours for social engagements. For me, I prefer to do a little bit of work everyday (since I’m used to a college student’s schedule) so I space out my obligations through seven days instead of five and have more free time during the week. I also try to have a proper breakfast and get errands out of the way early in the day, which often means working until 10 p.m. (with a break for dinner) to make up for it. I don’t mind, though, because I prefer to be outdoors when it’s still bright and sunny, which brings me to my next point …

    3. Don’t underestimate the need for sunlight.

    This goes for everyone, Dilberts and Carries alike. Whether you work in an office or an apartment, you’re probably not being exposed to as much sunlight as you should be. Take it from a Southern Californian who relocated to New England: the sun has a very real impact on your mood, productivity, and health. You probably won’t develop Seasonal Affective Disorder (commonly known by the unironic acronymn “SAD”) from working inside, but you might feel less energetic, irritable, and distracted, none of which lead to good work being done.

    4. Keep it clean.

    I have a tendency to let my dorm rooms devolve into dens of clothing piles, scrap paper, and unpaired shoes. My boyfriend, on the other hand, believes in “organized chaos”, which is actually much more neurotic than being a clean freak because it involves cultivating the illusion that you don’t put that much thought into organization when you are, in fact, much worse than any disciple of The Container Store. Since moving into his apartment, however, I’ve developed a new appreciation for cleanliness. I’ve noticed that when my living space is cluttered, my work suffers as a result, in part because it’s impossible to find anything when I need it, but also because I don’t want to be inside with my own mess. So I’ve learned to keep things organized during non-work hours, since otherwise, I’d be writing, playing, and living in filth. And that’s neither conducive toward work nor entertaining guests.

    5. Put some clothes on.

    No, your coworkers can’t tell you that your outfit is cute, but changing into something semi-respectable is worth the trouble, even if your bulldog is the only one around to appreciate it. Whenever it’s 3 p.m. and I find myself still in pajamas, or worse, naked, it already feels like my day has been ruined. Why? Because it clearly never got started if I’m typing away in the nude on my living room floor. Pull yourself together by putting on an outfit that you actually had to think about. Bonus points for make-up. That way, you are far more likely to go outside (see #3) some time before dusk.

    6. Have at least one meaningful conversation everyday.

    I’m embarassed to admit that the majority of my conversations happen over instant messages and emails. On some days, Patrick and Hamlet (i.e. my primary human and non-human companions) are my only verbal conversation partners. Why? I simply forget that the phone is a communication option, because I’m so used to texting, IMing, or emailing my friends and coworkers. Technology does make things more convenient, but it’s impossible to have a real conversation over IM alone, even if you boast 100 WPM typing skills. Start engaging in more offline interactions. It’s mentally stimulating and totally necessary for your sanity.

    7. Get a study buddy.

    Patrick is mine, because his grad student schedule also allows him to work from home. If you don’t live with or know someone who has a similar schedule, don’t be shy about asking strangers. There may be local writing groups or hangouts where telecommuters work together. You can also try posting an ad on Craigslist or announce your need for a work partner on your blog or Facebook. Even if you don’t acquire a permanent study buddy, you might meet some cool people with similar interests.

    In conclusion, it can be really easy to slack off on the details, like getting dressed in the morning and leaving your apartment. Just remember: your job is awesome for offering you the flexibility to be anywhere at anytime, but you are so not awesome if you use that as an excuse to be a hermit (especially a nude one).

    28 Jul 2009

    Bruno: A Social Experiment or A Queer Travesty?

    I’m about two weeks late on this, so forgive me if it’s been pointed out already, but isn’t Bruno just a social experiment disguised as low-brow entertainment?

    Bear with me. But first, a few points to keep in mind:

    1. Bruno is not some plot-driven drama you can enjoy alone. You go to this type of movie with friends. Half the fun is sharing the experience with other people.
    2. Fans of Sacha Baron Cohen will naturally be inclined to side with his character, even if they are homophobic bigots and even if Bruno is a walking, flaming gay stereotype.
    3. A personal disclaimer: I have never seen Borat and have watched about four Ali G segments in my entire life, including the one where he interviewed Naomi Woolf. It made me cringe.

    I watched Bruno at the Loews on the Common, the biggest theater in Boston, during opening weekend. The film was showing concurrently on two screens and ours was completely packed, so there were literally no open seats next to each other by the time the movie began (an important point to keep in mind for later). I was accompanied by Patrick, his German friend, and his friend’s boyfriend who is originally from Kazakhstan. Between the four of us, that makes one Kazakhi journalist and one German-speaking homosexual. Kind of ironic.

    To understand how Bruno is a social experiment, one has to recognize that there are two audiences. There’s the audience in the theater, of which I was a part, and there’s the audience depicted in the movie. The former may be laughing at the reactions of the latter, but really, both of us are the butt of Cohen’s joke.

    (SPOILERS AHEAD, though there’s not much to spoil, plot-wise)

    Here’s why: The film makes it near impossible for any young, hip, and seemingly open-minded person to walk out. There are two instances in Bruno when members of the on-screen audience are so offended that they walk out. The first audience is a focus group for a television pilot that the protagonist has produced with the help of his Filipino lover, with whom he assumes various positions. There’s also a segment which I can only describe as “penis-spinning”. The second audience is a group of spectators who expect to watch a pro-wrestling match and wind up seeing Bruno making out with his assistant instead. Unlike the first group, which was merely outraged, the second actually threw things into the ring and had to be restrained from approaching the actors.

    (END SPOILERS)

    Though I personally wasn’t shocked by the movie (which probably speaks to how jaded I am), I’m well-aware that its graphic content and language is hardly the norm in American cinemas. Patrick later described the movie as “an all-out assault on good taste”, which is actually quite a compliment, though you’d have to understand Patrick’s views to appreciate it. What I think he really means (and what I believe) is that the movie is an assault on homophobia and American conservatism. Because the theater audience is compelled to side with Bruno and distance itself from the conservatism of the people he pranks in the movie, anyone who walks out makes their prejudices quite clear. This is especially true given the huge popularity of the film. There’s no way to leave your seat in a packed theater without being noticed. If most people are watching Bruno with their friends, then there’s also the added pressure of peer judgment, not just judgment from strangers.

    The reaction from LGBT groups has been mixed, to be fair, and I can understand how one might be hesitant to endorse a movie whose protagonist embodies some of the worst beliefs about gay people. That being said, perhaps now is a time when an utterly unlikable gay character is actually a sign of progress. Bruno may be no Harvey Milk, but neither are most of my gay friends. That’s not to say that they’re all nymphomanic, trend-chasing fame whores, but they’re certainly not martyrs, so why does every other movie with a main gay character end in tragedy? Bruno is so unapologetic about his actions, so far from tortured or conflicted, and so fully in love with himself that his sexuality is almost secondary to his self-absorption. For that reason, I find the Bruno character far less offensive and more whole than other gay characters, most of whom are portrayed as either hate crime victims or accessories for single, white women.

    It surprises me that people don’t immediately recognize Bruno for what it is and instead write it off as another crude attempt at humor. I don’t think my interpretation is a stretch in the least, given that Cohen is rather smart, even if not always funny. Though I would hardly consider Bruno the best film ever made, I do think this 81-minute mindfuck is rather genius for mainstream cinema. If nothing else, it’s better than anything involving wizards or vampires.

    6 Jun 2009

    Haymarket For Beginners

    The less you wear, the cheaper your groceries will be.

    That’s the general rule of thumb at Haymarket, where produce is over-ripe and sellers are oversexed. In a chaste white button-up paired with short-shorts, I was the recipient of a ni hao ma, several propositions, and the best bargain I’ve ever encountered: 20 tomatoes for $2. It was enough to temporarily silence my inner feminist when the large, Italian man before me heaved, “Oh my god, oh my god, look at you.” Then he asked me where I was from and I snapped, “California.”

    At regular grocery stores, I can’t afford more expensive items like berries or peppers. At Haymarket, I could obtain enough of the former to open my own fro-yo shop. Today’s loot: two pounds of mushrooms, a package of celery stalks, two packages of baby carrots, a bag of onions, 10 red peppers, and the aforementioned 20 tomatoes. Grand total: $13. I’m making two pots of pasta sauce that will last several two-person meals.

    Bring cash. But not a twenty unless you’re catering a party, because $10 is already enough to get you a bushel of fruits and veggies. Literally a bushel. (Trust me, I asked a farm girl.)

    Another reason to not bring twenties: you will get your change in dollar bills. Hold on to them tightly. The throngs of both tourists and locals who flock to Blackstone Street each week present a ripe opportunity for pickpockets.

    Mold is not acceptable. Expect, however, for what you buy to look ugly. You will encounter misshapen peppers deemed too unsightly for suburban consumers. They are perfectly edible, even if unaesthetic. Remember, this is not a place to be a snob. Real chefs don’t shop at Haymarket, where grocery store cast-offs and rotting goods are sold for a quarter of the original price or less. They go to real farmers’ markets, like the one at Copley, which is mere steps from L’Espalier. But for young and broke home cooks like me, Haymarket is Mecca.

    There are plenty of options, so don’t be hasty in settling on price or quality. The entire market is two short blocks. Browse the entire selection with wallet closed. Allow yourself to be tempted only if it appears stock is nearly out (but don’t be fooled if it’s early in the day). Show up later and you’ll get better deals as merchants attempt to unload the remaining goods — most of which won’t make it to next weekend.

    Some sellers will get aggressive, even grabbing you by the arm. Others will be impatient, practically rude. Don’t take it personally. Be quick, be cordial, get in, and get out. Dwaddling and indecision are impolite.

    Last piece of advice: haggling is encouraged. But if you wear a crop top, you won’t have to.

    13 Apr 2009

    Why Yoga Is Sexy (And How To Make It Fit A Student Budget)

    It’s a well-publicized fact that I despise running and most forms of physical activity not involving penises. So with summer approaching, what’s an unathletic nympho to do? Yoga! Like sex, it involves a multitude of positions and morning-after soreness. (Unlike sex, your clothes usually stay on. This is key.) Additional reasons why I prefer yoga to other forms of exercise:

    1. Yoga isn’t competitive like sports, so even if I know I would theoretically place last in a human pretzel competition, I don’t actually “lose” if I can’t accomplish this.
    2. Yoga can be done by anyone at any age or stage of fitness. The same can’t be said for other exercise. Can you imagine prenatal football or free weights for kids? Not so much.
    3. Yoga, even when done as a group, can be adjusted to fit your level of expertise. Unlike running, I don’t feel like I’m slowing everyone else down if I have to pause and catch my breath on my mat.

    All that being said, yoga classes can get incredibly expensive. I usually only attend when I’m home in Los Angeles with my friend Evelina, who always has good recs thanks to her job at Yogamates. There are centers in Boston, but I cringe at the thought of having to shell out $100+ per month. I can barely stomach the thought of paying for gym membership after graduation.

    Luckily, bargains aren’t hard to find, especially in a bleak economic climate. Many studios offer discounted or free trial classes, and if you’re lucky, your city will sponsor free outdoor yoga at a public park this summer. Need to get toned before then? Here are a couple deals I found:

    The yoga apparel and lifestyle store Lululemon Athletica (with outlets in Boston, New York, and other major cities) hosts tons of complimentary health and wellness events, including free hour-long yoga sessions every weekend. The Boston store, located at the Prudential Center, holds classes on Sundays from 9:30 to 10:30am. Check the website to find a store local to you.

    In Boston, both Back Bay Yoga Studio and All One Yoga (in the North End) offer unlimited 2-week class passes for new members. The price? $25. If you attend a class everyday (and I assume you can attend more!), that’s less than $2 per session, a pretty unbeatable price for an introduction to yoga.

    Lululemon Athletica
    776 Boylston Street
    Boston, MA 02116
    (617) 262-2030

    Back Bay Yoga Studio
    364 Boylston Street, 2nd Floor
    Boston, MA 02116
    (617) 375-9642

    All One Yoga
    1065 Commonwealth Ave
    Boston, MA 02215
    (617) 789-3733

    25 Mar 2009

    Is sexual expression and feminism incompatible?

    I’ve had comments up on my blog for less than a month, and for the most part, I haven’t had any encounters with Internet fuckwads. Sure, some people disagree with what I have to say, but there are hardly any personal attacks (a huge improvement from my Sex and the Ivy days). A few recent exceptions have popped up on my semi-nude photo post:

    You are such a disgusting whore. Thanks for perpetuating the stereotypes women fight so hard to combat. [link]

    I pretty much dismissed this comment immediately since the commenter’s handle was “feminist” and yet she doesn’t make it past one sentence before calling me a “disgusting whore”. Kind of discrediting.

    But today, I received this comment:

    Why don’t you check out Meghan Asha, Mary Rambin, and Julia Allison’s venture. Those women, without taking off their clothes and posting naked pictures of themselves, are powerful, beautiful, strong women. They are women who do justice to feminism. Not you. Perpetuating the sexual objectification of women isn’t going in the right direction. [link]

    To which I responded, “You realize that a large component of the third wave of feminism involved reclaiming women’s sexuality for ourselves, instead of allowing it to be controlled, commodified, or restricted by society, right? Being asexual is not a prerequisite for being a feminist.” She replied:

    Yes, yes. We ALL know that you are of the “Sex-Positive” school of feminism. BUT reclaiming one’s own sexuality doesn’t presuppose exhibitionism. IMO, the naked photos you post of yourself may be well-intentioned, but that intent is lost when all you’re doing is “feeding the machine”. Whatev. Good luck with what you are TRYING to do. [link]

    I suppose it’s fitting that on Gloria Steinem’s birthday, I’m writing about a recurring disagreement in feminist discourse.  Here we go.

    What this commenter calls “exhibitionism”, I think is better described as “sexual expression” (because frankly, a photo of me in a bra and panties hardly counts as exhibitionism and is a hell of a lot less personal than some of the things I’ve written). Her complaint is nothing new. Some people — plenty of them women — believe I shouldn’t be as overtly sexual because I may inadvertently “feed the machine” in the process. Well, you know what? Trying to be less sexually expressive in hopes of putting an end to sexual objectification is a lot like promoting censorship in hopes of putting an end to violent pornography. Unless you live in Canada, it ain’t gonna fly, and things didn’t exactly go so peachy there either. Should I be concerned that some chick-hating sex maniac out there might be beating off to my image while thinking, “Oooh, what a hot little Asian slut!”? Maybe. But I could also avoid making the extremely sexist assumption that my male readers are all unenlightened cavemen eager to objectify me.

    Even Ariel Levy, author of Female Chauvinist Pigs, which criticized the rise of raunch culture (i.e. “the machine”) in America, told Susie Bright, “The whole point of sex radicals is to explore new and different and more creative ways to represent— and to have— sex.” And yes, in case you’re wondering, I do consider myself a sex radical. What concerns Levy are not women who are openly and publicly sexually expressive (like the triple threat Bright) but women “who weren’t prioritizing their own desires [and] were only automatically re-enacting what they saw around them.” In other words, intent matters. The major problem with the MacKinnon school of thought is that it ignores individual agency. To MacKinnon and even Steinem, there’s no difference between Tristan Taormino and Hugh Hefner, and that’s frankly just an outdated world view. The proliferation of queer and made-for-women pornography has changed the industry dramatically. Heterosexual men may still be the largest consumers of porn, but there’s a growing space where previously unrepresented groups are exploring their sexuality through both consumption and production of sexually explicit material. To put all porn in the same category is incredibly simplistic. It’s about as simplistic as implying that any provocative photo of a woman is anti-feminist, while ignoring the fact that my photo was posted on a blog owned, written, and read by women (as well as plenty of radical non-female thinkers).

    And here’s the bottomline: I don’t think anyone would chastise me if I were a dude who posted a photo of myself in boxers, and yet, sexual objectification of men also happens frequently. Would anyone expect for a guy to censor himself for the benefit of all guys? Don’t think so. So why should I, as a woman who actually is in control of my sexuality, take one for the team and shut the hell up? Isn’t that a double standard? When it comes down to it, I simply don’t believe that the way to achieve gender equality is by restricting those who are ballsy enough to own their sexuality and express it (in whatever medium). My blog and Girls Gone Wild are worlds apart, and at least in the environment where I live and learn, I get neither a gold star nor a trucker hat for flashing my breasts. What I do get is a lot of judgment, slut-shaming, and the assurance that I will never land the corporate gig expected of a Harvard graduate. So why do I feel compelled to blog? Not because I’m some passive victim of the male gaze but because I want people to stop thinking about female sexuality in such a limited manner. And if I can accomplish that, then occasional objectification is a very small price to pay.

    20 Mar 2009

    The Gym-A-Phobe’s Guide To Having Your Cupcake & Eating It Too

    I hate exercise. The majority of my early childhood was devoted to the memorization of multiplication tables, not the development of hand-eye coordination. Subsequently, I was a terrible athlete. The only B I got in middle school was in Physical Education. Other than a season’s worth of second string volleyball in 7th grade, I’ve never participated in an organized sport. (Not that it matters since Asian parents don’t consider “sports” real extracurricular activities, and yet the oboe is somehow a legitimate pursuit). So with sex as the single exception, I’m generally wary of physical activity. Even then, my idea of “girl on top” involves resting as much of my upper body weight as possible on my partner. Reverse cowgirl? Not even an option.

    But although I’ve always tried to be as sedentary as possible my entire life, it wasn’t until college that I experienced the repercussions. All of high school, I managed to stay a skinny minnie with on-the-go meals, little sleep, and massive overachievement. I didn’t have time to eat, and I worked so hard that I was burning the few calories I consumed, despite the fact that all my food either came from a vending machine or a deep fryer. I was tired constantly, but I never made it a priority to improve my nutritional habits before I went off to college. When I started my freshman year, I suddenly had way more time and I put it to use eating, sleeping, and underachieving. That fall, I gained 20 pounds in four months. I went from 115 pounds to 135 pounds. I’m 5’ 2”. That translates to stretch marks.

    I was pretty appalled by how quickly I outgrew my clothes. The situation was becoming dire when I finally hit my first gym. I don’t think I’ve ever been that terrified my entire life, and this was among my own sweaty classmates. My infrequent elliptical sessions were pretty pathetic, but by going back to California that summer, I managed to drop some weight eating my mother’s home cooking. A year later, I was hovering in the 128 to 130-pound range, approximately the size of my November freshman self. A reader put it best when she said: “You were in the same boat as many women - not traditionally overweight to start with, but still wanting to lose 10 pounds.” I signed up for a personal trainer at the university gym, who informed me that free weights were not, in fact, scary weapons. For the supposedly low price of $52/session, I felt competent at the gym for the first time.

    Here is when I started losing weight in earnest. I went to Switzerland last January and spent a day hiking two and a half hours uphill in the snow. It was the most physically demanding experience of my life (though not at all a big deal to the two friends who did this with me), and I was rather proud of myself for completing the climb up Europe’s longest sled run. A month later, I met Patrick, who introduced me to concepts like walks and the park. Between the Alps and Boston Common, it was the most contact I’d ever had with nature. As we got serious, Patrick began to suggest that I join him on his daily runs. After months of me laughing him off, he bought me a pair of ASICS. How could I say no?

    Six months later, I was 12 pounds slimmer, and today, I weigh approximately what I did when I sprang to my maximum possible height at 13. How did I do it and continue to eat cupcakes? It was surprisingly simple in retrospect, but in execution, it was damn hard. Here are some tips to make your fitness journey a little easier than mine:

    MOVE


    Tough it out. I went from running maybe 50 miles my entire life (most of it in P.E. classes) to running four miles four times a week. It was horrible. Side aches, nausea, panting, you name it, I felt it. Of all physical activities, running is my least favorite, probably because it’s the most effective at burning calories. But because I told Patrick that I’d be open-minded about it, I didn’t give up immediately. It took about three weeks before running stopped being something I dreaded. Once I got used to it, I found being outside relaxing and the running energizing. My sentiments changed from hate to tolerance over the span of two months, and I still hover back and forth depending on the temperature out. But though my running regimen has degenerated to less than once a week this winter, I now only dread running because it’s cold, not because I’m bad at it. I intend on hitting the Charles again come spring (um, any day now).

    Count calories (but not like that). If you can’t stomach the idea of running consecutive miles, try doing it with calories in mind. Though I don’t advocate calorie-counting when it comes to food, I find it highly motivating in exercise. Use a program (like Traineo or FitDay) to calculate how much energy a person of your height and weight uses during runs at various speeds. Knowing that I just burned off lunch is better than any runner’s high.

    Feel badass. For some people, that means contorting their bodies into the shape of a pretzel. For petite gals, self-defense classes may do the trick. When I started lifting weights, I had a lot of fun, in part because it was something that previously intimidated me. Lifting also allows you to recognize improvement very clearly as you move up to heavier weights. The goal with a fitness plan should always be progress toward becoming more fit, not more skinny/pretty/buff/etc. As unlikely as it may sound, you WILL feel damn proud of yourself when you demand more out of your body than you ever have before.

    Make a financial investment. At least in this case, you’re in control of whether it pays off. I personally think it helps to spend money on a fitness goal because you’ll be more motivated to follow through, although this might only apply to broke writers like me. In the six or so months when I was actively losing weight, I purchased long underwear ($80), workout gear ($60), and running shoes ($100) and registered for a marathon ($90). It was a lot more money than I ever thought I’d spend on an activity I despise, but I definitely felt obligated to get off my ass (even if I never ended up running the marathon). I also figured these initial costs will also pay off in the long-run, since most are one-time, multi-use purchases, unlike the personal trainer from my junior year. Unless you too live in an unfortunate place like Boston, you probably won’t need expensive winter running gear, but you could commit to a series of pilates lessons, get a gym membership, or even just buy new workout clothes.

    EAT


    Have three meals a day no matter how much it doesn’t fit your schedule. You’re not going to feel like working out if your energy levels plummet throughout the day. If you’re never hungry in the morning like me, get in the habit of juicing. (That being said, juice is not a substitute for all solid food intake.) My routine breakfast costs $0.50 to Odwalla’s $2, not including juicer. Sometimes, when I wake up too late for breakfast, I make up for it at night with a bowl of cereal after dinner. Those aren’t midnight munchies; that’s your stomach asking for its third meal. Appease your appetite accordingly with a nutritious option instead of junk food.

    Cut down on take-out, frozen meals, and processed food (especially artificial drinks). Cereal is my only processed snack, and I even now bake my own cupcakes. Once you stop purchasing and eating vacuum-sealed crap, you’ll never be able to go back to it, because it’ll taste so much worse than real food. When you hit the grocery store, skip the aisles where you know there’ll be temptation. If you don’t think you have the willpower to resist, a budget-friendly alternative to grocery stores is farmer’s markets (I live a 20 minute walk from Haymarket by the North End) which don’t carry processed foods at all. If you don’t buy it, you won’t have it on hand come midnight. (CHOOSE THE CEREAL INSTEAD!)

    Learn to cook, even if your only appliance is a microwave. Besides the lower cost, the benefit to preparing your own food is that you can control how much fat goes inside. This even goes for juice (which is better made fresh) because supermarket cartons contain all kinds of added sugar. In cooking, I use tricks like substituting applesauce for fats in baking, being sparse with sugar in dressings, and halving the oil in recipes. If your schedule doesn’t allow for regular cooking, try making several days’ worth of meals on one Sunday evening, or hit Trader Joe’s for frozen meals that are healthy, low-budget, and tasty. Steamers and sandwich presses are also great for preparing food quickly.

    Have a cupcake. Three courses (an appetizer, entrée, and dessert) are mandatory on my dinners out. When I was in Austria for two weeks this January, I was eating five courses a night after skiing six hours all day. For me, allowing myself to satisfy my appetite is the reward for treating my body well. There’s no point in working out and eating healthy all week, if you can’t ever indulge during the weekend. At the same time, this only works if three-course meals are the exception, not the norm. The key is to practice moderation not during dinner, but in the frequency of dinners.

    DRINK

    If your liver’s like mine, it needs a break. The majority of my freshman year weight gain was in the form of vodka. Despite the abundant dining hall food and constant study breaks, the biggest influence on my eating habits was not the availability of food 24/7 but the presence of alcohol at social functions. Think about it: a shot of vodka (the least caloric and sugary of all alcoholic options) is still 100 calories. At my lushiest, I was consuming an extra 400-600 calories a night on two or three nights a week. And what was I getting out of all of it? Um, depression and hangovers.

    I essentially stopped drinking a year ago, save for the occasional glass of celebratory champagne. If you’re really serious about losing weight and willing to make the lifestyle change, I suggest you drastically cut down on alcoholic intake or eliminate it altogether. For me, it wasn’t much of a sacrifice since none of my friends are particularly devoted to getting wasted. But if you can’t imagine a life of sober interactions and regret-less mornings, then at least consider replacing booze with other judgment-clouding substances. And no, I’m not talking about cocaine, no matter what you’ve heard about its appetite-suppressing abilities.

    KNOW


    The prerequisite to any fitness plan is having realistic expectations. Society’s obsession with the ideal female body type has done considerable damage to the psyches of young women. I strongly discourage anyone from striving for perfection because as I’ve said before, what society expects of you is certainly not attainable. You can learn that the hard way by getting discouraged when you don’t see the results you want, or you can train with the goal of improvement in mind. Despite all my unathleticism (or perhaps, because of it), I became incredibly motivated when the strenuous intial runs turned into easy six-mile jogs. I didn’t actually lose visible weight until a good eight weeks into my effort, but because I was juding my progress on more than my appearance, I felt like I had every reason to be proud of myself.

    Accept your body for what it is. In some ways, I’m incredibly glad I gained 20 pounds my freshman year. I’d been uncomfortable with my body up until college, and it took the weight gain for me to realize that I wasn’t any less desirable, interesting, or smart just because I was heavier. When I first met Patrick, I was really comfortable in my own skin, and though I felt great when I lost weight, the emphasis was always on learning to do a joint activity (like running) together. I think that’s the only reason I was successful. In the past, losing weight was like being bipolar because I thought of my body as something I wanted to change, not something I wanted to improve. For weeks at a time, my mood would be completely dependent on the scale. By making it about the miles, not the pounds, getting fit actually felt empowering.

    You’re not on a healthy diet if you have to describe it using the word “never”. Abstinence and deprivation just aren’t good ideas, with sex or with diets. Don’t make sacrifices that will substantially affect your quality of life. The reason why many diets fail is because their unreasonable restrictions can’t be sustained over the long-term. Even if you do succeed, at what cost?  I sure as hell wouldn’t be happy with a cupcake-free existence even if I were skinny. As with my three-course dinners, I don’t feel badly or consider it “cheating” if I decide to have a carton of ice cream on a weeknight. But because ice cream isn’t on some blacklist of things I’m not allowed to have, I don’t intensely crave it often anyway. (After all, I can just order it for dessert on my next meal out.) Nothing should be forbidden, not only because it’s unrealstic, but because it also discourages you if you break your own rules.

    Guilt and shame are counter-productive. As I’ve admitted before, I used to have incredibly unhealthy attitudes about food and struggled with bulimia during my early adolescence. Attaching feelings of guilt to something doesn’t shame you into not eating it. If you want it bad enough, you’ll eat it anyway. But chances are, if you’ve been on a diet of nutritious, natural foods, you’ll find your much-coveted snack pretty gross when you actually eat it. The key is not to starve yourself as punishment, but to know better for next time.

    Love your body no matter what happens. After gaining and losing 20 pounds over three and a half years, I’ve also gained and lost half a cup size. I was initially disappointed when this happened, but I’ve since come to terms with my rack being as modest as my stature. The truth is that few women can “have it all” in terms of the perfect body and many women simply can’t maintain size-2 bodies unless they consume 1,000 calories a day for the rest of their lives. Why should anyone have to severely restrict their diet (or pump their boobs full of silicone) just to look a certain way? What you see as flaws may very well be what others envy. One woman’s “fat” is another woman’s curves. Rather than thinking in terms of imperfections, focus on getting to know and love your body through exercise.

    Lastly, stop thinking of fitness regimens as temporary. If you make room for indulgences and start snacking healthily (fruit is seriously underrated), then what starts off as a “diet” can easily become part of your normal lifestyle. After months of not touching chips, fast food, or cocktails, I have no desire to consume any of those things anymore, but I still make myself cupcakes every week so I don’t feel deprived. As for exercise, it very much became something I was looking forward to. I still hate running sometimes, but I consider six miles a fair trade for dessert since I know it’s the only reason I can eat whatever I want and not gain weight. If I knew how to swim and had access to a pool, however, I’d probably hit the water every day whether or not I planned on dessert. Ideally, you find a physical activity you can see yourself sticking with for a long time, or at the very least, are willing to tolerate.

    This was a tad more motivational than originally intended, but I really wish someone had told me all these things when I was a freshman or sophomore. I’m living proof that even the biggest gym-a-phobe can reform. If I can do it, then it should be a piece of (cup)cake for you. Good luck!

    3 Mar 2009

    Afraid of appearing patriarchal, the College promotes an ideal for female students—the career-oriented woman—but not for male students. Though this attention to women is long overdue, University Hall should also define what it means to be a Harvard man…

    One student at the discussion last week noted the lack of decency in Harvard men today, concluding, “Being a good man is not a high priority.” Indeed, that’s because moral education is not a priority for the College. The old Harvard had its prejudices against women and minorities, but it tried to teach its graduates as best it knew how. Now, University Hall seems determined to train the next generation of professional women, yet it seems to have forgotten its men, explaining to them the boundaries but never the game plan.

    This is a completely uncritical approach to the real problem with Harvard: professional tracking that equates economic equality (between genders, classes, etc.) with progress. The admission of women, now the majority at the College, and the existence of women’s organizations do not mean that the gender gap is any narrower at Harvard (all you have to do is look at the fact that the Women and Gender Studies committee is still a committee and not a department).

    Further, I’d argue that the “ideal for female students”, that of the “career-oriented woman”, is an ideal that sucks. I don’t feel empowered by the professional options Harvard makes available, and gender equality can’t be achieved by imposing on women the same capitalist restraints that men have suffered under for decades. So now we’re all equally incentivized and pressured to conform to certain professional expectations? Well, yippee, now I get to be just as oppressed as the next guy.

    Let’s face it: all Harvard students are in dire need of being unconditioned. A “moral education” is only useful if it goes beyond charm school. I’m less concerned about ungentlemanly conduct than I am about Harvard churning out entitled minions of Corporate America. Unfortunately, forcing students to think outside of the box is against the College’s economic interests, and for that reason, I don’t see the professional climate changing anytime soon.

    2 Mar 2009

    Womanhood, or Adventures with my Uterus

    First comes love, then comes domestic partnership, then comes Lena with a Bugaboo stroller!

    Okay, not so much, but much of my day has revolved around the ticking of my biological clock. This includes educational activities such as:

    • Reading this article (via Young Manhattanite) on how modern life has made women “ignorant and ill-equipped” to deal with motherhood, something I definitely agree with. My youngsters, if they ever emerge from the dark abyss that is my vagina, will be raised almost entirely by my grandchild-hungry mother.
    • Relearning everything I learned last year in my “Myths of Motherhood” class about midwifery and natural birth, which are excellent alternatives to sedatives and a team of eight strangers watching you peeing, pooping, and pushing your way to motherhood. For some reason, the latter option is considered “normal” in our society.
    • Chatting with Christine about her decision to get an IUD, which I may actually consider for next year once I’m back on the Harvard health plan. (MIT students only pay $45 because the university subsidizes the cost of the IUD, which is usually $500 for a device that lasts five years.)
    • Researching the cost of Massachusetts health insurance, because I’m running out of birth control, and apparently, my salary is “three times the poverty level” so I am, therefore, ineligible for discounted health insurance. Except for the part where MassHealth totally fucked up when calculating my income. I’m reapplying and I expect serious subsidization of my uterus, since universal healthcare is why I gave up California residency.

    26 Feb 2009

    For 58 years, the Communist regime in Beijing has waged a quiet war against the Tibetan people and their unique culture … The UN, NATO, the United States—any organization or nation with significant international sway—need to put pressure on the Chinese government to cease its suppression of the Tibetan people. The world learned the terrible consequences of imperialism long ago, and we must stamp it out entirely wherever it rears its ugly head. Tibet and its people are some of the world’s most beautiful remaining examples of piety, brotherhood, and peacefulness.

    Obviously, I’m in full agreement that China’s actions in Tibet are nothing short of atrocious. Nonetheless, this article completely rubbed me the wrong way, for a few reasons:

    • By overemphasizing the “peaceful” and “unique” aspects of Tibetan culture, the writer completely misses the point that human lives and rights are valuable in themselves, regardless of whether the “culture” attached is one the Western world deems worthy of preservation. The constant references to “piety”, etc.  implies that the only reason we should act is because the culture worth saving. What if the Tibetans were a bunch of burger-eating, reality TV addicts? Would the eradication of their rights and lives not be a concern since there’s enough burger-eating, reality TV-watching cultures out there?
    • Vilifying China while putting Tibet on a pedestal is more discrediting than anything else. “Communist regime” and “the evil genius behind the Chinese plan”? This just reads like propaganda. How is communism relevant here? No one would describe the US as a “democratic regime” while criticizing our actions abroad. McCarthyism is over, so check your scare tactics at the door of 14 Plympton, please. And statements like “when a television tower is dumped on their shrine, most Tibetans simply smile and keep on praying” are just ludicrous and without merit. I’m guessing that most Tibetans are not thinking happy thoughts for the Chinese government. Are we to believe that the Tibetans are completely devoid of human emotions like resentment simply because of their “unique” culture? Generalizing an entire group of people as perpetually forgiving in the face of eradication is demeaning, condescending, and nearly as bad as eradicating them.
    • It’s completely hypocritical to call for American intervention to STOP THE IMPERIALISTS. We’re suddenly the moral authority, now? You might as well take the last paragraph and replace it accordingly: “We cannot continue to ignore Afghanistan/Vietnam/Cambodia/Iraq, nor can we continue to balk when human rights are in danger. Any organization or nation with significant international sway—need to put pressure on the US government to cease its suppression of the Afghan/Vietnamese/Cambodian/Iraqi people.” Guess what? If this were a Mad Lib exercise, no one would even know the difference.

    Clearly, I am all for ending abuses in Tibet, but all this editorial does is distract from the real atrocities while promoting stereotypes (“Oooh … the peaceful Tibetans!”) and a double standard (when China’s doing it, it’s imperialism; when America does it, it’s “liberation”).

    18 Feb 2009

    An Open Letter To The Human Rights Campaign

    Dear Human Rights Campaign,

    I’m sure that y’all have plenty to worry about given the economic climate and a slowing stream of donations, but can’t you take like 90 seconds to write out a spiel for every volunteer to memorize and repeat when asked about the Human Rights Campaign’s stance on transgender rights? I mean, anything remotely convincing will do.

    Because based off my interaction with one HRC rep this morning, I’m convinced that either you’ve been doing a shitty job training your volunteers and have left them hopelessly misinformed OR they’re purposely being misleading in hopes of tricking me into supporting your organization.

    This is what Patrick and I were told this morning, when I questioned the volunteer on transgender issues:

    “I know some people are upset that we supported that bill which wasn’t trans-inclusive, but just so you know for the future, all the legislation we’re introducing this year also protects gender identity and expression.”

    This would be rather reassuring, except for the part where “that bill” — better known as ENDA — was also trans-inclusive when it was first introduced. And look where that got us. The language “gender identity and expression” was later removed when it appeared it would not pass if included. As a result, pretty much every other LGBT organization in existence, most notably the National Gay and Lesbian Task force, pulled their support for the bill. They weren’t going to back legislation with their time and money, unless it included protections for all. And yet! The HRC continued to support the bill, despite having previously made a very public commitment to only support all-inclusive legislation. Liars, liars, fairy wands on fire.

    And by the way, in case you thought this shit is irrelevant for the straights, keep in mind that “gender expression” applies to all — transgender or not, gay or straight, white or royal ass purple — since even the most unqueer of folks can and do get fired for not conforming to gender-related workplace norms. The revised version of the bill — the one HRC blindly threw their support behind — doesn’t protect chicks like your sister or mother or best friend or ME who may identify straight women or tote around über masculine boyfriends, but who need these protections in the boardroom as much as the queerest of queers. Because all those perfectly straight, perfectly safe people who fuck the right gender but maybe sometimes express their own in non-traditional ways? (Girls who wear overalls! Boys who like eyeliner!) Yeah, they can get fired for that in the majority of American states and have zero legal recourse. That’s right, you can be a victim of transphobia without even identifying as gender-queer. Not such a safe existence, after all, huh? And THIS was what was cut from ENDA.

    The HRC has done a lot of great things but there’s a reason why it has a reputation as an elitist, non-inclusive organization. It’s uncritical of powerful politicians, most notably Obama (who I do not count among LGBT supporters, by the way). It’s almost entirely fundraising-minded. And as the ENDA debacle illustrates, it prefers political expediency over principle. Sure, you may argue that “incremental progress” is better than nothing, but if the same argument were applied to civil rights, we’d still be stuck in an era of “separate but equal”. The original ENDA was for all of us, and the revision HRC backed was a cop-out.

    Seeing as how this was all a very public blow to the HRC’s image just a few short years ago, it’s just slightly, well, embarrassing when you’re being represented and defended by a volunteer who has no idea what your platform is on something that is extremely controversial and important to your donors. This is only like the most divisive issue of the past decade, after all. Is it so much to ask that your volunteers (in Boston, of all places!) at least feign knowledge on the topic? Because he clearly had no idea what the fuck was my point.

    So for the ENDA slight and for this one, I say FUCK YOU, HRC. Based on how totally uninformed your volunteer appeared, I’m not convinced that your priorities are any different today than they were a few years ago.

    Sincerely,

    Lena Chen

    ss_blog_claim=2e43b69a85ddf3d9e1b2923415211607