the ch!cktionary

    7 Jul 2010

    Musings From A Reformed Attention Whore

    I graduated a little over a month ago and since then, I’ve managed to turn in a few writing assignments and two episodes of my Sex Really web series while traveling sans wifi. Not too shabby, but I haven’t had much time to think or much time to do substantive first-person writing, the sort of stuff that could potentially help me craft a memoir. In other words, I am well on my way to not starving (thanks to a few regular freelance checks in the mail) but my energy should really be focused on trying to write the bajillionth draft of the book proposal I’ve been ignoring for the entire length of my relationship with Patrick.

    I am not blaming the Roomie for my lack of creative output. But due to the various controversies that have ensued since we met, I prefer to keep him and our relationship off my blog and unconnected to my online identity. In general, that’s been a good policy when it comes to my friends as well. You know all those gals with whom I partied and puked throughout all of college? Yeah, they grew up, got jobs, and would really appreciate it if I could refrain from broadcasting their walk-of-shames to thousands of people. Which I can understand, despite my employer-less status. Of course, this wasn’t always the case, not when I was regularly blogging about boys and booze. (Remind me some time to tell the story of the Reality Television Show That Never Was. We were young, impressionable, and terribly misguided, but there are really no excuses.) And because this wasn’t the case, Sex and the Ivy got a brilliant two-year run, in which all sorts of embarrassing and endearing anecdotes about my friends and crushes were relayed with gory details intact. But none of us are 19 anymore, and honestly, I don’t even have any gory details to share (unless you count menstruation stories, which I really think you could do without).

    And due to this combination of Growing The Fuck Up and Keeping A Low Profile, the previous two years has gone unchronicled and my blogging has evolved to detached commentary on gender and sexuality. These are subjects which are certainly worthy of attention, but I used to approach them from a much more personal perspective and revealed too much about myself in the process. I really don’t do that very often anymore. In fact, I actively try to avoid doing that. The problem is that you can’t really expect to write anything that’s even mildly close to “memoir” when you have no idea how to end a sentence that starts with the word “I”. As so many of my detractors like to remind me, I used to be a self-obsessed attention whore. I like to think that I still am, but perhaps, I’ve been letting myself go.

    It’s time for a change, don’t you think? In the next few weeks, I will try to write (more) honestly about my life, which includes all these lovely insecurities which I’m sure will make you feel better about yours. I’ll post snippets from my old blog entries that are going into my book proposal and reference all those cringe-inducing drunken escapades that made my college years simultaneously memorable and hard to remember. I’ll also try to make a regular habit of keeping an off-line journal, perhaps my best chance at preserving thoughts without sacrificing privacy. The entire point of getting a Moleskine is to stimulate all those literary impulses that have been repressed for fear of having my privacy invaded and my personal life dissected. Sure, I could have tried (and did try) to keep secret online journals. But it’s hard to get myself to type up thoughts and send them into the blackhole of cyberspace when I could type up thoughts and send them into Google history. With a paper journal, there’s pretty much only the former option unless I die famous and worthy of posthumous publication. Let’s hope for the latter.

    Otherwise, let’s hope the subjects of these Moleskine musings aren’t particularly litigious.

    9 Feb 2010

    Der Spiegel hat einen Artikel über mich veröffentlicht! Aber nicht so schnell …

    Der Spiegel, one of the largest European newsmagazines, published an article about the American abstinence movement and feminist reaction to it. I’m pretty excited that I scored a mention/photo in a German publication, because all things German have become awesome since I’ve begun learning the language.

    Unfortunately, my German abilities remain pretty rudimentary, so I’ve had a hard time translating … but they’re not so rudimentary that I didn’t realize that the piece is actually somewhat reactionary. Yeah, what a disappointment.

    I was reading along happily until I got to the paragraph about me, which includes a reference to my “ultrakurzen Minirock” that excites the boys on campus. That means “ultra-short miniskirt”. Wait … why are they talking about my clothing choices? And where are these ultra-short miniskirts, because Cambridge, Massachusetts is sure as hell not the ideal place to wear them. (I may have been deluded about this my freshman year, but I — and my hemlines — have long since grown up.)

    This is kind of like that time when The New York Times wrote a piece that featured me alongside the then-president of Harvard’s abstinence club. While the writer refrained from physically describing the other girl, the main subject of the article, this was what he wrote about me:

    Chen was a small Asian woman in a miniskirt and stilettos…

    This is after I already corrected the fact-checker prior to publication, telling him specifically that I was not actually wearing a miniskirt and stilettos. But whatever, I have sex so naturally, I also walk around naked in impractical footwear! Let’s just gloss over the fact that I was actually wearing a dress and shoes with a wide heel. The truth would detract from reinforcing the image of the sexually available woman. And while we’re at it, why not exoticize me a bit? I’m small! I’m compact! I fit in your handbag! It doesn’t matter what the other girl looks like; let’s check out the chick who’ll let dudes bang her.

    Anyway, it gets better:

    [Chen] ate every crumb of everything, including a ginger cake with cream-cheese frosting and raspberry compote. Fredell, when the dessert menu came, paused at the prospect of a “chocolate explosion,” said, “I may as well — I mean, carpe diem, right?” And then reconsidered — she really wasn’t that hungry.

    I’m amazed at what passes for news. The fact that this food-sex analogy is so contrived is a testament to how stupid the virgin-whore dichotomy really is.

    But I guess the German liberal media is just like the American liberal media: not incredibly progressive after all. While articles like the ones above approach sex more positively than Fox News, they still can’t help but think of female sexuality as a binary, something that can be neatly categorized in boxes labeled “virgin” and “whore”. I may have sex and openly write and talk about it, but that doesn’t make me representative of all sexually active women any more than it makes me conform to some tired vixen trope. And while I do hope that these types of stereotypical depictions decrease, I’m not terribly optimistic. After all, this is the explanation I received from the writer when I complained to The New York Times:

    Lena is right that i described her outfit to draw a distinction from [the other girl], and it is also true that her outfit was distinct from [the other girl’s]. Whether her dress was short or not is subject to interpretation, she is right, but I think almost everyone would agree that indeed it was very short and that her high heels were very high.

    Which is why I’m not even going to bother fact-checking Der Spiegel.

    7 Jan 2010

    When I Was 20

    My friends have a tendency to categorize my college experience as pre- and post-Patrick (or pre- and post-domestication-of-formerly-unruly-sex-blogger), but I think the split really occurs not when I met the current roomie, but two Christmases ago. I’m referring to those infamous nude photos, whose surfacing and aftermath have been neatly summarized in a recent piece in a Canadian paper. It felt strange to comment on the incident for the article, given how much time has passed and how young I was then (not that I’m much older now). But though many things have changed since, I don’t know if I’d handle it any differently today, which is probably why I seemed “remarkably blase” in the interview. I think I did the best I could at the time.

    In the winter of 2007, I was single and living alone in Currier House, still blogging primarily on Sex and the Ivy, and seriously considering writing a memoir (which has long been shelved in favor of my senior thesis). At 20 years old, I was completely unprepared to deal with such a deep invasion of privacy, though I wonder if that’s the sort of thing one is ever prepared to handle gracefully. It wasn’t about the fact that I was naked on the Internet nor was it about the sociopathic ex who I’d long written off. I was never ashamed of my body or of people seeing it, but rather, I felt victimized because I had been exposed without consent and doubly victimized by those who wrote salaciously about the incident. The initial IvyGate post was how most of my classmates found out about the photos, and the subsequent coverage on Fleshbot, Bostonist, who knows where else, informed the world beyond Cambridge.

    In the weeks after, I encountered little sympathy and plenty of mockery. It was easy for strangers online to say that I was “asking for it” when they weren’t in my shoes, freaking the fuck out (quite literally, in the form of panic attacks), and very much certain that I didn’t ask for this shit. However, I was mostly appalled by the way I was treated by other Harvard students, who had no moral qualms about Googling the photos and sending them to one another. It wasn’t the first or last time I felt totally alienated, isolated, and violated by the campus at large, but it was easily the worst time because I was going at it alone. Unlike romantic troubles or an uncalled-for rude encounter, this was a situation that literally no one in my life could understand or empathize with.

    So how did I get over it? By leaving Harvard. I made the best of finals and submitted multiple late papers thanks to a note from my therapist. I got a prescription for an anti-anxiety medication I never ended up taking. I went to Switzerland for nine days with two girlfriends, hiked uphill in snow to reach the peak of the world’s longest sled run, and had a lot of sex with someone who was not a sociopath. Thankfully, I emerged from my depressive haze without the least bit of generalized hatred toward men, since I met Patrick, a.k.a. “the Guy”, shortly thereafter. In the subsequent months of my junior year, I transitioned slowly away from my old blog and into this one. Mid-semester, sleuthing e-stalkers unmasked and defamed “the Guy”, pretty much cementing my belief that I could never return to writing openly about my own sex life. I also moved, for all intents and purposes, into Patrick’s then-apartment and never once looked back at the option of living on campus. By the time I got Ad Boarded for not turning in two final papers, I was just completely done with Harvard. Everyone was telling me to finish the damn papers — which were completely doable — and I was thinking, “What’s so bad about having to take a year off, anyway? I freaking hate this place.” When I left Harvard at the end of May, I had already long checked out emotionally. I hadn’t even slept in Currier for months and only showed up to move-out in order to shove things into boxes. Two months later, I turned 21 halfway around the world from Cambridge. I went back to Boston a few weeks later and moved in with Patrick, with whom I lived during my year off. Harvard has never felt like home again, not even after I returned as a student this fall.

    This is all to say that even if I appeared “remarkably blase about the incident” in my interview for the aforementioned article, it was hardly an insignificant event in my life. I’ve said most, though not all, of the above before, and often, it feels like I’m repeating myself when I discuss this topic. Maybe that’s because I’m still grappling with what happened. The reaction to those photos simultaneously defined and epitomized my college experience, which often felt like a circus act performed before sadistic spectators. Someday, I’ll have to post the “reflective” essay I submitted to get readmitted to Harvard. It was more a condemnation of my classmates than it was an expression of remorse, and if the administration ever had doubts about how cruel Ivy League students can be … well, now they know. Back then, I was also very much of the mindset that the bloggers and reporters who wrote about the photos were simply doing their job: writing about the news. Only in the year afterward did I realize that having a sex blog hardly makes one newsworthy and that furthermore, gossip is not news. It would have saved my sanity had a few individuals simply thought twice about clicking “Post Entry”. In retrospect, I regret that I wasn’t more critical of the writers who exploited the source of my personal anguish for page views.

    In a few short months, I’ll have a Harvard degree in addition to hundreds of unfavorable Google search results to show for all this trouble, yet I’ve never quite forgiven or forgotten the on- and off-line masses who judged, dissected, and mocked my younger self. In a coming-of-age film, the above drama might be characterized as the experience necessary for eventual personal growth or finding Mr. Right or whatever. Winding up with a bulldog-owning Yalie is kind of the perfect happy ending to the Ivy League version of Sex And The City. But outside of HBO world, no one needs to nearly get their life ruined in order to emerge triumphant. The reality is that people are often mean without justification, you may or may not learn from this stuff, and the guy you end up with in the aftermath is not necessarily the pay-off for putting up with bullshit. Though I survived my ordeal more or less intact, with a boyfriend and a puppy dog to boot, I have never regained my former faith in others’ inherent goodness. Which is good, because I was really just being naive. The crazy ex who posted those photos could have easily been written off as a psychotic exception to the generally sane population at large, but what happened in the aftermath demonstrated to me how thoughtless, judgmental, and unkind normal individuals can be and that this tends to be the rule, not the exception, and that Harvard kids with all their privilege are not exempt from moral failings despite being in a position where they should theoretically “know better”.

    And that realization, not Patrick, is what really prompted some rather radical changes in my life. Harvard has a knack for fooling its students into becoming incredibly invested in their peers. The cult of the Ivy and all that. The belief that your success is mine and vice versa. Even at its rawest, my blog up until that point reflected a painful desire to be liked. I was well-aware that my subject matter was slightly edgy and my reputation slightly soiled, but hardly unsalvageable, nothing a book deal couldn’t fix. It wasn’t until the ugly aftermath of the photos that I started to question what I was trying to prove and who I was trying to prove it to. It was then that I stopped participating in superficial social interactions, ceased going to anonymous parties, and completely disengaged from communal college life. In other words, I no longer viewed my classmates as flawless individuals who I should be grateful to know.

    Up until then, my go-to future plan had always been Move To New York, Write A Memoir, Become Carrie 2.0. Now that graduation is actually on the horizon, I don’t find any of the above particularly appealing. I will almost certainly stay in Boston, at least in the short-term, and perhaps I will still publish a book, but not because I feel the need to apologize for my sordid past by seeking redemption via commercial literary success. As for Carrie 2.0, I’d rather aspire to be Jessica Valenti. But the truth is that I don’t even have New Year’s resolutions, not to speak of a multi-year life plan. I don’t have any idea how 2010 will turn out, since I didn’t do corporate recruiting in the fall, haven’t looked for a job, failed to apply to grad schools or take the GRE, and have no real intention to think about post-graduation life until I actually graduate (or at least until I finish my thesis). Two years ago, this would’ve struck me as terribly complacent, perhaps even boring, but right now,it just feels liberating.

    6 Oct 2009

    “Are you going to blog about me?”

    In Sex and the Ivy’s heyday (2006-7?), I rarely ever went out or hooked up with a guy who didn’t ask, “Are you going to blog about me?” Those who didn’t bother to ask were people with whom I had very specific arrangements (i.e. regular friends-with-benefits, which in my case, almost always refers to an actual friend, believe it or not) or people who I just didn’t care to inform about my blog (which includes some pretty strange flings like the three-week romance with the actor I met one summer in New York). Yet despite the frequency with which I heard it, I never ceased to be surprised when a guy asked the inevitable question.

    “Why in the world would you think this is noteworthy enough an experience to write about?” I used to think out loud.

    Most of the time, the accounts on my blog were of regular fucks, reliable fellows in my arsenal of men, “friends” I suppose you could call them. The qualifier “regular” really doesn’t mean much here. Sometimes, I didn’t see a guy for a series of weeks, and if I pined after them at all, it was never for very long (at least not after getting burned my sophomore year). In any case, I wasn’t exactly making editorial decisions based on the quality of the fuck or the level of my romantic interest in a guy. I was way more interested in figuring people out, which is why I preferred to stick to dissecting my boring, bland, and romantically-going-nowhere fuck buddies. They, at least, I could relate to in a semi-pleasant manner. I realize only in retrospect that my inability to sustain interest in most men outside the bedroom then was probably the first sign of my now full-blown misanthropy. Whoops.

    And nowadays, the only thing I blog is my dog’s bowel movements.

    24 Jul 2009

    New contest on Sex and the Ivy! I’m giving away a full package of treatments at Pure Salon and Spa in Dracut, Massachusetts.

    TWO lucky readers will each receive:

    • A wash, haircut, styling, and blow dry
    • A 30-minute signature Pure Nature AVEDA Facial
    • An additional $50 toward your choice of make-up application or hair removal services

    That’s a $133 value, and all you have to do is answer the following question:

    When wallets tighten, beauty treatments are the first luxuries to get slashed. What’s your best tip for someone who wants to look and feel great without spending a lot of money?

    Submit your response here for a chance to win.

    17 Jul 2009

    … I have never once regretted writing Sex and the Ivy, but it’s not until now that I’ve acknowledged the full extent of what I lost because of it. I spent most of college disassociating myself from my peers, physically running away (to New York, to Philadelphia, abroad), and questioning my own sanity. And sure, I was defiant, and more importantly, I was in the right. But what good is being right when you’re an unhappy, suspicious person? Now that I know the alternative, I could care less about my writing or what others see in it or what they see in me. I’d rather be happy than defiant on principle.

    None of these people who have done me wrong will get their comeuppance. There’s no such thing as god or karma and even if there were, I’m not looking for justice. I’m looking for happiness, and thus far, I’ve only found it in a private life. I could wait endlessly for divine retribution, or I could try to be happy knowing what I know about human nature and what people are capable of…

    15 Jul 2009

    Lines That Don’t Work

    I just notified the winner of my July 4th giveaway, but there are too many incredible submissions to not share. The following are some of the most cringe-worthy pick-up lines and catcalls:

    • “hey kitty cat, you’re so cute just like a kitty cat. I’m Josh.”
    • “we can be your ghetto tour guides”
    • “wenn das dach rostet, ist auch der keller feucht” directed at a redhead (German for “if there’s rust on the roof, the basement must be wet as well.”)
    • “Baby, can I see some ENTHUSIASM!”
    • “I would give the world to be that banana” directed at Teresa, who was eating a banana
    • ”you’ll be sweet on tempurpedic”
    • “Hey, I love sushi!” directed at an Asian girl

    Thanks again to Emotional Bliss, who will be gifting the winner with a Womolia Heat.

    10 Jul 2009

    Last call for catcalling stories on Sex and the Ivy! Submit an entry for the chance to win the Womolia Heat vibrator.

    1 Jul 2009

    After a lengthy hiatus from Sex and the Ivy, I’m giving away a Womolia Heat ($99.95) from Emotional Bliss to a lucky reader for Independence Day. To enter, comment on the contest entry with your best/worst catcalling story. For inspiration refer to mine.

    Please reblog and link out to your female friends! (Unfortunately, the Womolia is designed to fit the curves of a woman, so boys will have to wait for my next giveaway to score free toys.)

    27 Mar 2009

    Cross-posted from SexandtheIvy.com:

    I’m incredibly scared of loss. And I know I shouldn’t feel like I lose something by sleeping with someone, but I do. I decided to stop having sex because I was sick of giving away all these pieces of myself and subsequently worrying about unintentional attachment, ill-advised yearning. It felt like I had no control.

    I rarely reread entries on this blog, but tonight, I clicked on this link on the sidebar. I feel so far away from this girl, and yet, I think I finally understand what people mean when they tell me that my blog entries make them wish that they could give me a hug. Lame as it sounds, I wish I could give 19-year-old Lena a hug.

    I wrote this when I was in New York the summer after my sophomore year of college. I lived across the street from Tompkins Square Park and spent as little time as possible with other Harvard kids (pretty easy, since they all worked in finance). I had spent four months forgoing sex after dating two guys in a row who both turned out to have girlfriends. I stopped trusting men almost completely, and I say “almost” only because my best friend is a guy (albeit one with zero sexual interest in me). It was pretty much impossible to sleep with me, and I’m certain that I was an insufferable date. I didn’t even go on dates with the goal of falling in love or whatever it is people hope for when they set up contrived meetings with total strangers. I dated out of boredom, and I genuinely didn’t care when I didn’t get called back. If a guy had told me he wanted a relationship, I would’ve laughed in his face. Who do you think you are? Who do you think I am?

    Now, when I read myself, I feel sad. I feel sad that I was so utterly broken that I was incapable of experiencing any sort of emotion toward men. I had made up my mind at this point that this blog meant more to me than social acceptance, that what I stood for was more important than the existence of a love life, and that there was no possibility of love in any case since no man would willingly sign up for this. It’s not true, of course. There are plenty of progressive, open-minded men. I knew some even then. But I wouldn’t have sex with even those guys, because I could no longer differentiate the bad apples from the entire population. When I said “no”, it meant, “No, I don’t need any of you.” I was miserly with trust, and once I had mentally checked out of the dating game, no one had any chance of penetrating my emotional armor or anything else for that matter. And yet, as closed off as I was, I was undeniably happy that summer and happy to go back to school and happy to be alone. I was finally free of seemingly endless heartbreaks and disappointments, because I had ceased to hope. And in a strange, satisfying way, I was incredibly at peace for the first time in a long time. In the back of my mind, I thought, “I’m going to be alone forever, and this suits me just fine.”

    It’s strange to read words I wrote years ago, but even stranger to think about the subjects of my stories and the people they’ve become. For an extremely public blog, I did a damn good job of not letting anyone’s identity get revealed, which is why it still boggles my mind that someone out there managed to figure out, spread rumors about, and viciously attack who I was dating. Patrick is the first and only man I’ve ever named, and obviously, not by choice in this case. Him aside, I suppose I’m grateful that the only person who ever got hurt from Sex and the Ivy was me. But even after the controversy subsided, I never did put much of my relationship with Patrick down into words. In retrospect, it was because he meant more to me than anyone ever had, and transcribing my feelings to text suggested a permanence I wasn’t ready for. It’d be admitting that he meant something to me, and even if he didn’t know it and my readers didn’t know it, I would certainly know it.

    I met Patrick during what was probably the most emotionally tumultuous period of my life. I was so utterly terrified of loss, of losing Kennedy, of losing my family’s support (if they found out about this blog), of losing him, and honestly, of losing myself in him. I was so afraid of losing the ability to be alone and happy at the cusp of 20. And while I desperately wanted this to work out, I simply couldn’t envision a future with him. I couldn’t envision a future with anyone, because I had become so fully cynical in my views about love. It took me months to admit to myself that he cared about me. I spent half of our relationship in doubt.

    To some extent, I regret never recording our beginning, if only because the compulsive chronicler in me feels like memories will slip away unless I jot them down in the moment. But on the other hand, I’m glad there won’t be a Patrick to reread years from now. I don’t want him frozen in time, unchanged from sheer force of will. I refuse to turn him into a character, even if it means preserving his memory. When we have problems, I don’t think to write them down. When we’re happy, I don’t think to write it down either. That impulse has simply disappeared, in part because the unstated goal of blogging was always to figure out who I was and who I wanted to become. Now that I know … well, this blog will never be what it once was, because I’m not who I once was. To be honest, I hope I never feel compelled to write here again. It’s an artifact from a time when I was unsure about many things, most of all my worthiness of being loved. Years from now, whether we work out or not, I don’t want to read about Patrick. I’m certain of that much. If we’re still together, then this version of him will seem like such a distant representation of who he later becomes. And if we’re not, then I don’t want anyone — least of all myself — reminding me that I was once in love. Living it will have been enough.

    ss_blog_claim=2e43b69a85ddf3d9e1b2923415211607